The failure of graduates to fit into the job market occurs when universities are already outside the educational role assumed at the beginning of their studies
A requirement for the integration into the labour market of their students, has not been taken up by institutions in the us. The economic prosperity of the university may not be achieved by the failure of the graduates, and none of the distortion that the current policies regarding the education of their spreading to the rest of the economy
Usa you have to meet a national goal set out in the framework of the Europe 2020 strategy in the achievement of the completion rates of studies of the university of 26.7%. From this point of view, Romania is on the right track, and in 2014, reaching a rate of completion of 25%.
However, the model of the competitiveness of the developed land is based on its low cost of labor, low wages, as put by mrs. Angela Filote, the head of the European Commission's Representation in Romania. And so it was that the graduates of higher education, they are forced to accept a job that is not able to exploit the knowledge of the university. Unfortunately, the fix for this issue is not among the criteria according to which the Usa will be assessed at the european level.
The students and their families will spend a record for the majors, undergraduate and graduate; however, students who fail to fit, though, as they consider, make a great deal of effort into finding a job. The conclusion is devastating, is that higher education institutions are not able to deliver the results expected of all of us, to train graduates capable of. But if they would not be at risk of financial penalties?
In order to find out the answer to this question, it is useful to have a preliminary assessment of all the factors involved. Universities are allocating more resources to the recruitment and retention of students, so that all abandonment is waste of time, money, and the amount spent on regular basis for the replacement of that student or that student drop out.
Students who are not graduates, or those who are completing their studies, but who's to hard to find a place to work, it creates the negative reputation of the universities from which they came. In order to counteract this reputation would be undesirable, they are devoting too many resources. We bring together all these elements, it is clear as to the failure of the student to follow the path of an educational application, they pay for it. Let's continue with the idea of the punishment of the financial university as I have pointed out above, that they are already paying a price.
He has asked the university to pay a second time for the poor performance of their business, it seems that it doesn't make too much sense, while the square ”higher education” is already sanctioned institutions of the poor. The universities are the producers who refuse to see how their products fail in the market in which it is supposed to be a competitive and disclaims any responsibility for the integration process and, subsequently, the formation of the support that it provides.
The assumption that the educational institutions should be able to control the access to the labour market, and the earnings of graduates, that's when we consciously choose to send their graduates unprepared for the labor market, in which they have to struggle to find and keep a job? If any of these universities would be able to control who is graduating, and who doesn't, and what the argument is rational, he would be able to get to the graduates ' competitiveness as well as recent graduates ill-prepared? If I had to choose, what would it produces, colleges and universities, and a different combination of competitive?
The universities are faced with a lot of criticism about the unsatisfactory level of education and training. I can't help but wonder what the circumstances of the institutions that control the highest standards of education's failure to deliver the goods up to the standards of more than one employer
The approach from the point of view of the business education you need to highlight that it is cost-effective for them to occur below the level of the standards. A model student with no success on the labour market, we need to account for all the additional costs for the repair of your reputation, and for the inclusion of students to replace those who have left it.
What is missing from the reasoning above, it is the idea that the success of the labour market, it is a route with a two-way street on which academic knowledge, the motivation and efforts of the students, there are also factors that influence the integration of the post-graduate, and elements external to the educational process. In the light of the above, they can't control the trajectory of the labour market for graduates, but can't control the recruitment of learners who turn out a real desire to succeed in the field of their choice.
The risk of failure of the graduates is shared instantly between the two sides. If, however, the educational institutions should be held accountable in terms of the identification of the long-term needs of the candidates and of the labour market, that's when the questions raised above, and you may find the answer in the terms and conditions of the application, and the result of the courses in each of the universities.
The alternative is not viable, it is that the funding of universities of their students, should be made directly to the university, through the conclusion of the contract by the university, have to bear all the expenses for the training and specialization of the student. The reimbursement of all the expenses shall be made in the form of a percentage of the income of graduates employed in the labour market. This will not only have a role to play penalizator, and the role of responsibility and, as such, it implies the institutions of the educational level and the quality of the education they provide.
Any misrepresentation of the student's support for the promotion prior to the period of the registration, as well as the process of selection focused solely on the volume, as currently practiced by the university, will be reflected directly in the income of the institution, which ignores the role that it plays in education, and, of course, the labor market, the failure of the graduates, which they consider it appropriate.
The current criteria for the division of the risk of failure of a graduate student is working exclusively on the system. In addition, both students and universities will be able to find a justification of what is quantifiable in money, of the value-added that they bring to the economy.
